CEP 824 Unit 3 Reflection
- Shuaiqi Hu
- Feb 11, 2022
- 2 min read
What did you learn?
In S. Grover and S. Basu. 2017, the biggest takeaway is the “design pattern” or assessment argument, which can emphasize the definition of the FKSAs (focal knowledge, skills, and abilities). I usually will start my objectives with "student will learn ..", which are teacher&curriculum facing. The assessment argument is assessment-facing and that teaching goals evaluate if students can really do something.
clarified learning goals
learning goals | “design pattern” or assessment argument |
|
|
In addition, when I created a block-based activity for my students when students successfully created a program, I will say it is a successful activity. With readings, I found that a summative assessment also can be used in teaching. I really like the examples the author provided. Some of the contents even overlap with the Geometry curriculum, such as if-then statements.
What lingering questions do you have?
Where the line of boundary is set between those two types of goals?
How can we write each type of goal precisely for each learning objective?
What are other great examples of a summative assessment? aka. How can I create one? (i.e. missing great ideas of creating a good activity. )
How can we fit CS content into the math curriculum?
What thoughts does it inspire as you consider creating an inclusive computing culture in your classroom?

I really like the examples of the summative assessment the author provided. It gave me some ideas on how to make a computer science problem. Some of the contents even overlap with the Geometry curriculum, such as the if-then statements. Although I don't have a chance to teach computer science right now, I can still provide some other types of summative assessments inside Geometry for students, such as making end-of-chapter projects.
Reference
S. Grover and S. Basu. 2017. Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: Examining misconceptions of loops, In Variables, and Boolean Logic. ACM Press, 267--272.
Hazzan O., Lapidot T., Ragonis N. (2014) Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education. In: Guide to Teaching Computer Science. Springer, London
Comments